Solution
(AC1.3) Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you apply these to your own and others’ ideas. Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 450 words |
Main Principles of Critical Thinking Critical thinking allows people to maintain data impartiality while they evaluate multiple perspectives to generate evidence-based logical conclusions (CIPD, 2019). Rational thinking processes along with deep accurate information and relevant clarity form the essential elements of critical thinking methods. Accurate information needs fact-checking prior to making conclusions while the principle of clarity defines concepts making understanding simpler for others. The selection of key information plays a vital part in decision-making because it identifies important components for the process. The foundations of depth and logical reasoning consist of thorough element review and systematic thinking practises that minimise personal emotional choices. A definite collection of principles helps individuals develop good rational choices specifically when dealing with human resources and people practise situations. Applying Critical Thinking to Develop My Own Ideas The learning and development (L&D) programmes at Riyadh Bank received my critical evaluation during my time there. At the beginning executive staff introduced a wide-ranging employee performance enhancement training schedule. The initial proposal received unfavourable feedback from me which led to my investigation of skill deficits among employees and training registration measurements. Specific professional training programmes at the organisation generated better outcomes than traditional training approaches in past performance assessments. My assessment of data, and thoughtful analysis led me to build training solutions which addressed job needs and organisational targets. Analysis using critical thinking demonstrates its worth for decision-making effectiveness by testing established ideas with verified evidence (Young, 2023). Applying Critical Thinking When Evaluating Others’ Ideas I utilised critical thinking strategies while reviewing my colleague’s suggestion to restructure rewards. Executive staff suggested adopting a company-wide bonus system to improve worker motivation across the organisation. Initially I reserved approval for the proposal evaluation through assessment of market trends alongside employee preferences as well as financial constraints. Both competitive analysis and employee surveys showed non-salary benefits and career advancement opportunities held equivalent worth for organisational staff members. We created a performance-based reward programme after a series of organised discussions which integrated bonus payments with career advancement possibilities for company staff. Through the evaluation process it became clear that critical thinking requires extensive assessment and joint decision-making practises. Critical Thinking in Rational and Objective Debate Critical thinking makes discussions rational because it needs evidence rather than assumptions and emotions to support its points. Multiple factors demonstrate why HR professionals need to present strong rationale in their decision-making processes since it lets them show both their proposed policies and their initiatives. Workplace resolutions with organisational goals and fair decision-making become achievable through evidence-based analytical problem-solving which critical thinking provides (CIPD, 2023). |
Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full