Portfolio Task 2 nature and use of “validity” when designing a research questionnaire at master’s level

Question:

 Identify and analyse the nature and use of “validity” when designing a research questionnaire at master’s level. (Approx. 1,500 words academic report style)

Solution:

Intense research on the best practice of mitigating prevalence of plagiarism in global universities has intensified in the past decade. For instance, in 1999, after chancellor of one of the UK universities concerned with plagiarism cases at university, the active decision making as a consequence of plagiarism was significantly delegated to individual lecturers. According to Batane (2010), this strategy failed in meeting the purpose of since different lecturers tend to adopt a distinct attitude towards plagiarism cases and imposing distinct penalties to the students for similar academic crimes. The situation equally failed in meeting the requirements of Acts of Human Rights.

In 2000, there were intense consultations and reviews in the UK on the best practice of mitigating plagiarism by initiating a strong policy (Glendinning, 2014). This included evaluating the best strategy of identifying the plagiarism in the students work and punishments on the same. At this time, standards were altered and subsequently introduced in the entire university. Also, the specialist position on academic behavior was equally identified. Additionally, there were prepared conditions for annual reviews, an increased spreading of levels of experiences and measures set for improving the phenomenon in this area. These strategies have nevertheless not been successful in mitigating the plagiarism cases. The ideal recommendations for eradicating the unethical behavior include; Another strategy is creation of an intolerant culture to Plagiarism in an institution. This recommendation can be implemented by ensuring that there is a culture of active involvement and engagement with the lecturers in offering interesting tasks and being open to all students’ opinions and ideas and holistic explanation of all tasks (Wijaya & Gruber, 2018). This can be coupled by instituting a phenomenon where good experience to students is instrumental. The process can be inclusive of lecturers adopts similar requirements to the students and themselves. Also, a safe presentation can be enhanced, return, and system …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..Please contact our team to receive guidance, support and tutorial services on this assessment based on your level of expectations

Email address: rankedtutorials@gmail.com